Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Daniel M. Bensen's avatar

It's cool that the citation form of the verb is the past. That reminds me of Salish, which I've been staring at recently.

What's the relationship between dratak "drank" and dratok "took"? Dratok looks like a derivative of dratak. It looks like dratak is irregular, but dratok has been regularized: where the future of dratak seems to break down as "dra-ess" (ROOT-ess), the future of dratok seems to break down as "dratak-ess" (STEM-ess). Maybe the way you nominalize a verb is to change its second vowel (with a stress shift?), so 'dratak (stress on the first syllable) became dra'tok ("a drink"). That was then turned into a new verb 'dratok (with the stress back on the first syllable but the second vowel left as O to dissimilate it from the verb "drank"), meaning "had a drink, took medicine."

Thus the paradigms:

TO DRINK

Dra-tak: past (citation)

Dra-et: present

Dra-ess: future

TO TAKE

Dratok(-tak): past (citation)

Dratak-et: present

Dratak-ess: future

Is that what you were thinking?

The Black Knight's avatar

This is one of my fictional race posts I promised you, the Taz'aran glossary entry.

https://theblackknight.substack.com/p/tazarans

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?